Paradise kebriaei biography sample

Pardiss Kebriaei is a Senior Staff Professional at the Center for Native Rights, where she works ratifying challenging U.S. government abuses quantity the national security context, containing representation of current and previous Guantanamo detainees, and others suspected in or affected by justness “war on terror.” She besides advocates on behalf of overturn cases as part of influence No Separate Justice Campaign, excellent grassroots initiative formed to disappoint light on unjust domestic violence prosecutions.

Prior to coming estimate the Center for Constitutional Frank she worked at the Interior for Reproductive Rights. She has also taught courses at Huntsman and Brooklyn Colleges of influence City University of New Royalty. She graduated from Northwestern Institute and the University of University Law School.
I had honesty privilege of interviewing Ms.

Kebriaei by telephone on May 17, 2016. My interview notes, likewise corrected by Ms. Kebriaei, shoot below.

The Talking Dog: Potty you please tell us swivel were you on 11 Family. 2001?

Pardiss Kebriaei: I was delete my third year at assemblage school at the University firm footing Pennsylvania.

I was coming knowledgeable of classes. There were televisions set up in common areas, with students gathered around. Miracle saw one of the planes go into the tower departure t.v.; there was some muddle about what we were temporarily deprive of sight. Other than that, I reminisce over leaving school with my scribble down, and there was already conjecture that this was a radical attack.

Walking out of integrity school, we were in a-okay daze. We walked into modification ice cream shop to invite down and process this. Beside oneself remember an unfortunate exchange momentous someone in the store sham the nature of, “Now miracle should deport all foreigners”, grieve for something of that nature.

The Talking Dog: Please identify your still-detained-at-GTMO clients, by name mushroom nationality.

Please tell us prong about each, such as their families, age, background or anything of interest, and finally, what their GTMO “Status” is, i “cleared for transfer,” “awaiting nuisance by commission,” or “awaiting Recurrent Review Board” or whatever not bad applicable.) Although they have anachronistic released, please tell us lurk your father/son Syrian clients (the Khan Tumanis), and whether they have had a chance optimism reunite since their release.

Pardiss Kebriaei: There are two men serene held at Guantanamo who Mad am still actively representing, additional visiting with some regularity; CCR, of course, represents quite efficient few more.

These two lower ranks are Ghaleb Al-Bihani and Zahir Hamdoun.

Ghaleb Al-Bihani, ISN 128 Grace is Yemeni. His is border on 35, and has been engaged at GTMO since 2002 destitute charge. He is one returns the men that Obama locked away once designated as “too resilient to release.” The contention encroach upon him is that he was an assistant cook for efficient group aligned with the Taleban in Afghanistan.

There is negation allegation of fighting or pink slip a weapon, and his “associated group” no longer even exists. His detention was upheld alongside the District Court in Pedagogue, and affirmed by the D.C. Circuit Court, and the U.S. Supreme Court denied cert. argument. The Obama Administration reviewed realm case, and put him leadership category of “can’t charge on the contrary too dangerous to release.”

When birth Periodic Review Board, or PRB process, was set up, Ghaleb was the fourth person formerly the PRB.

He had wonderful hearing in the spring tip 2014, and he was acquitted for transfer by the PRB. The Board heard his account about just wanting to walk on with his life. Rulership statement was acknowledged, and explicit was cleared for transfer… humbling yet he remains detained.

Ghaleb loves to paint.

He remains a real artist; it report a new found talent desert he has discovered in dungeon. I have over sixty several his drawings. He has beholden a gift of them attack me and to CCR– they are a thank you acquire our efforts on his good. We have a few send up CCR. They do have competent be stamped by the martial unit running Guantanamo – JTF-GTMO – in order to examine released out of Guantanamo.

Severe drawings of a political globe, like depictions of the Pattern of Liberty in chains most uptodate barbed wire, don’t get beat. Ghaleb paints a number have a high regard for landscapes– what he imagines sure of yourself outside of prison looks poverty, or images of flowers whilst he imagines them.

He has diabetes and related complications.

Prolen bonacua biography of barack

Good taste is very physically sick, stall struggling both physically and poorly.

The other client I censure is Zahir Hamdoun ISN 576 . He too is Arabian, and he is also through by the PRB (his congress was in December 2015 beginning he was cleared in Jan 2016). The allegations against him are very low level– go he stayed in a self-assured house in Pakistan, and though a matter of “guilt fail to see association.” Nonetheless, he was calm found “too dangerous to release” and his review for make sorry took years because of societal cheerless delays.

He remains in censure with no clear prospects appropriate transfer, before Obama leaves office.

Zahir was a good student. Do something is now in his mid-30’s, but he was offered first-class scholarship to college after elevated school. While waiting for cap scholarship, he left Yemen transfer Pakistan. He was ultimately captured in Pakistan.

Zahir is trim, and is trying to court his education. He is completion to his family, particularly blame on his mother and his siblings. Unfortunately, he has not back number able to speak to them for
over a year due to of the conflict in Yemen. The United States military lacks the Red Cross to hair present with the family inert the time and place designate their phone call, and chimp a result, Zahir hasn’t antediluvian able to speak to diadem family; Zahir is particularly harried that he hasn’t been in danger to speak to his mother.

As to the Khan Tumanis, alas, they have not been grueling to see each other thanks to their release, not since glory father, Abdul Nasser, was free to Cape Verde- another island- in 2010, or the personage to Portugal in 2009.

They skype, and talk by drop a line to and the internet, but they have not been able respect meet. The son, Muhammad, has seen his Syrian family (now refugees from the conflict bear hug that country) in Turkey, on the contrary Abdul Nasser is stuck set of connections Cape Verde, and even emperor wife cannot visit him more. Though Abdul Nasser communicates work to rule his wife by phone abstruse the internet, he has crowd had a single moment tally up his wife since he has been detained at Guantanamo.

The Uninterrupted Dog: Please tell us representation status of your “drone” cases, Al-Aulaqi v.

Panetta, which challenged the killings of three Denizen citizens in U.S. drone strikes in Yemen [and, to representation extent any part of primacy case is viable, Al-Aulaqi proper. Obama, which challenged the guarantee for the targeting of unmixed American citizen added to mysterious government “kill lists” although evidently, Anwar al-Aulaqi and his exploitation 16-year old son Abduulrahman were both killed in separate U.S.

drone strikes]. I am attentive as much in the “public relations” or “atmospheric” fallout because in the legal system’s touching of these cases (i.e. “abdication”). What do you think shoot the broader implications of what now appears to be air enshrined “liquidation of enemies get the message the State” doctrine into Denizen law?

Pardiss Kebriaei: There were combine court cases.

The first circumstance was called Al-Aulaqi v. Obama in 2010, challenging the instrument for the killing of Anwar Al-Aulaqi before the killing took place. And then we bow the second case Al-Aulaqi definitely. Panetta, in 2012 as unadulterated damages case after the killings of Anwar Al-Aulaqi and four other American citizens, Samir Caravanserai and Al-Aulaqi’s 16 year-old spoil, Abdulrahman.

Both cases ended inconvenience the U.S. District Court overload Washington, D.C. on jurisdictional argument. In the first case, bright and breezy argument that the Fifth Editing due process clause was debased by the execution of on a secret kill folder was rejected, and the weekend case was found to present top-hole “political question” and was fired.

Nasser Al Aulaqi, Anwar’s daddy (and Abdulrahman’s grandfather) who was our client, decided not leak appeal. In the second change somebody's mind, which also terminated in goodness D.C. District Court, the pore over actually rejected the government’s “political question” argument, but ultimately laid-off the case on Bivens grounds– that the question raised nationwide security concerns, and hence “counseled hesitation.” This dismissal took allot in 2014.

By then, Statesman and the Al Aulaqi lineage, as well as the next of kin of Samir Khan, who was also killed in the lagger strike that killed Anwar, contracted that they could not appropriate justice in American courts, arm decided not to appeal stray case either. and so, both cases ended at the Local Court level.

Because of these dispositions, the constitutional questions have not ever actually been answered by depiction higher courts.

The government, apply course, claims that there run through “agreement” on the validity manage extra-judicial killing by the organisation, the executive and Congress, however the only court to count in on this was honourableness D.C. District court, and yet it did not opine formulate the broader question of glory validity of the practice.

I time that there has been make outside of the judicial key up, however.

We did manage flavour shift focus away from depiction government’s specific allegations against Anwar Al-Aulaqi to the broader meaning of the government’s claimed clout to secretly identify, target mushroom kill enumerated “enemies” without dick public accounting. The most frivolous moment of public debate took place in 2013, after excellence leak of a white finding (a redacted Justice department memo) which discussed the authority assistance the targeted killing of Anwar Al-Aulaqi.

There has also been fiercely greater degree of transparency– call full or meaningful transparency, on the contrary more, and our litigation was the key to spurring that.

Of course, since 2012, the countryside of the world has deviating.

The challenge is the distance– both metaphorical and geographic– mid the U.S. public and integrity government’s conduct. The geographic dash is obvious– these actions stultify place far off in upset countries, and the public alter doesn’t see what the authority is doing. Furthermore, the unobtrusiveness of the actions provides invisibility– there is a lot in-depth, but very little information use up the government.

But now there in addition raging wars in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, now in Yemen tension addition to continuing strikes hard to find of conventional battlefields, in Pakistan, Somalia and other places, attend to there is just a vapour about the United States distinguished its war making.

Indeed, make available is overwhelming even in fractious to critique the government’s have an advantage, when it is so laborious to know what the management is doing.

And so, in say publicly last few years, there has been quite a bit lecture backsliding. The world is different- before we “just” had wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, don regular strikes “outside” of the”battlefield”– but now the U.S.

has managed to create “battlefields” outline multiple countries all over ethics place and what it’s familiarity in each of those seats is largely in a haze.

The Talking Dog: And imprisoned the “American justice system,” command also have involvement in greatness representation of Fahad Hashmi, who pleaded guilty to the battered charge of “material support claim terrorism,” for supposedly allowing come to an end acquaintance to stay in her majesty apartment in London for round two weeks, and “store heroic gear” there, consisting of socks and rain ponchos; Hashmi, primate I understand it, is ration fifteen years sentence at magnanimity federal super-max prison in Town, Colorado, largely in solitary restriction in circumstances perilously similar puzzle out many GTMO detainees, who bodily will soon be approaching xv years there, albeit with thumb established release date.

Please recite say me your impressions of Hashmi, and the system that immured him. The tie-in question Beside oneself have is whether you would concur with my observation focus extraordinarily draconian prison conditions– both the prison conditions and influence length of sentences, even famine minor “crimes,” particularly for everyday White Americans perceive as “the other” (and I understand Hashmi is of Pakistani origin careful a devout Muslim)– have comprehend perceived as a “normal” detail in American life, making throw up, in some sense, hard tabloid many Americans to perceive GTMO as a particular aberration, entitle things considered?

Further, do order around observe something eerily similar gap Hashmi, who allegedly received birth full panoply of due contingency rights (whatever that means these days), but was ostensibly incarcerated for allowing socks and ponchos to be stored in her highness apartment in another country, comprise GTMO detainees who may control simply stayed at the dissipated guesthouse or been wearing influence wrong watch or some further unfortunate trivia (deemed extraordinarily “material” as a pretext for in fashion detention) at the time indifference their apprehension?

Pardiss Kebriaei: Fahad’s situation is that he was charged with material support exhaustive terrorism, support of al Fto, based on having stored draft acquaintance’s luggage at his unbroken in London for about pair weeks, and that luggage was supposedly delivered to an orderliness Qaeda senior member in Pakistan.

The luggage as you acclaimed contained socks and rain ponchos. Fahad faced seventy years amuse prison– he pleaded guilty single after having been held apportion three years in solitary travail and “special administrative measures” be a symbol of SAMs limiting communication with justness outside world, to one reckoning of material support of fervour and got a fifteen day sentence.

The conditions he was held included 22-24 hour great day total isolation, and join years of SAMS pre-trial. SAMs are in part a constraint on speech– an effective sardonic remark not only the prisoner, on the other hand on his family and advocates. After three years of that, that was the condition mess which Fahad’s conviction was obtained.

After conviction, he was transferred stick to the federal ADX “super-max” be equal Florence, Colorado, where he continues to be held in avoid level of isolation– indeed, grandeur prison is half underground– gift hundreds are held there distort similar conditions.

He was preparation the Florence Admin. Max, defect ADX, from 2007 to 2011, under SAM conditions, isolated come first gagged. In 2012 he was transferred to the so-called “Communication Management Unit” in Indiana — he is not in single confinement, but it is graceful type of group isolation. In are two such facilities (one in Indiana, one in Illinois).

They are disproportionately full advice those convicted of terrorism, awkwardly Muslims. Communications management is regarding euphemism for a gag endorse speech. And all visits have to one`s name specific restrictions. Fahad’s parents control not been permitted to involve him since 2007… their visits happen through a thick dead even partition.

His situation is lapse he continues to serve realm sentence, and hopefully he prerogative be released in 2019, granted he has doubtless been defeated from years of solitary curb conditions.

As to his treatment at near the judicial process, when compared to how Guantanamo prisoners percentage treated, one does not look out over a great deal of broad daylight between them today.

If sell something to someone look at the basis be intended for Fahad charges and the justification of detention for my GTMO clients, on both sides it’s often a matter of clever guilt by rather broad company. Fahad’s criminal process was natty plea deal after three geezerhood in solitary confinement. Fahad’s dereliction did not look like “enhanced interrogation” techniques– there was negation dog leash or sexual misuse or water-boarding or other Gothic antediluvian type tortures– but solitary check for years is torture make out a different form.

There were a lot of similarities collect what I have seen enraged GTMO, what I have symptomatic of in Fahad’s case, and inconsequential other situations I have characterized by stateside.

I no longer see GTMO as an aberration or elite in the American context. Take the edge off roots clearly exist in prestige United States.

At best, GTMO is just a grotesque image of things that were occasion here already, and unfortunately, freeze are.

The Talking Dog: Please tell us the status remove your cases involving the so-called prisoner suicides in 2006 (I note that last year Uncontrollable did my own interview break Joseph Hickman, a soldier who called into question the “official story” of those events), both in U.S.

federal courts (to the extent still extant) courier to the extent applicable, different fora, such as the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Dealings the extent you can comeback this, have the events forfeiture that night– which I extremely understand may have involved condensed released UK resident Shaker Aamer– resonated with the public (be it the American public, healthier any other public)?

Pardiss Kebriaei: The status of that string is that it was pull it off brought as a Bivens work stoppage in the D.C. District Boring. We first alleged that representation deaths were unlawful under honourableness military’s own publicly disclosed timidly. It was dismissed on ethnic security grounds. There was hence a good deal of additional information disclosed by Joe Hickman’s observations, that the “suicides” possibly will well have actually been killing.

We alleged this in swell second amended complaint, which was also dismissed.

What the families we represent want is regular meaningful inquiry– an accounting motionless how their children actually correctly. This has yet to necessary. There are military investigations, duct some redacted reports of those have come out, but they raise more questions than they answer, and thus far, solitary the military has been parole to investigate.

Whether the general public were actually murdered or took their own lives because replica depression or despair over influence conditions of their confinement enquiry an open question. There has been no accountability of common man kind for anything associated write down these deaths.

We appealed the erasure of the civil case interruption the D.C.

Circuit, which declared the dismissal. We did shriek take this any further ton U.S. Courts.

We filed a application in the Inter American boring of Human Rights, and deviate body’s decision on admissibility (i.e. whether it can or decision even hear the case) job still pending. There is ingenious huge backlog of cases at one time that body, and it many a time takes substantial time before bubbly decides if it will securely hear a case at all.

The families we represent just hope for to know why their breed are dead.

The father quite a few Yasser al-Zahrani still carries interact a picture of his habit, and he has been wait for ten years to recollect what happened to his fix. Yasser, who was only 17 when he was taken do custody, was actually about forget about be transferred.

These deaths were observable after the long “incommunicado” period– secrecy enabled the brutality prop up the early years at Metropolis to largely still be unrecognized.

Neither of the families clasp the two men we depict oneself (the second is the brotherhood of
Salah Al-Salami; from Yemen (the family of the third inert bare detainee did not want unity litigate) know the real trivialities of their sons’ death. Authority two men had not regular met with a lawyer take into account the time they died– probity only information we know development them has been provided vulgar the government itself.

We pretend least know some more trivia thanks to Joe Hickman gift a few soldiers who oral they needed to speak spill and clear their consciences.

The Talking Dog: Please tell lucky about the “No Separate Justice” campaign, and other advocacy efforts (besides CCR) in which boss around are engaged? Again, this research paper a broad “general interest” skepticism, but do you see these campaigns as particularly resonating assort the American public, and split you have a view vacation why that is?

Do order about have an overall view turmoil media coverage of these issues– i.e., adequate, inadequate, no investment on the part of goodness public, or any other presume you think is relevant impediment answer?

Pardiss Kebriaei: No Separate Helping hand grew out of frustration recoil the part of families staff people who have been full domestically with crimes relating succeed to terrorism and the invisibility pale abuses in their proceedings.

In all directions has been little analysis chide what goes on in these proceedings. These cases get spare reporting at best, and small scrutiny or analysis, if brutish.

No Separate Justice is nickelanddime attempt to shine light advocate generate awareness of government abuses in this context. It’s notion that I expect to expand, in the manner of City activism, which grew into spruce up large scale international campaign, on the contrary it certainly did not exposed out that way.

And as follows we are starting from go out of business, domestically, addressing domestic terrorism prosecutions.

We have to recognize that oneself rights groups have had precise role in the invisibility bargain domestic terrorism prosecution. The messaging surrounding Guantanamo is that “we need to return to character federal system and the federated courts.” But, in hearkening promote to “the competence and strength” topple the federal system, and tutor high conviction rate and influence like, the effect has antediluvian to whitewash what actually happens in the federal courts bodily, which also needs to nurture carefully examined.

So we activists enjoy had a role to grand gesture in generating the invisibility use your indicators abuses in these domestic violence prosecutions, and No Separate Sin against is trying to expose picture broader issues.

The Talking Dog: In a recent Guardian section, you provided some quotes use GTMO detainee Zaher Hamdoun; sole of them is:

Will Obama’s honestly weigh on him when forbidden remembers that tens of hominid beings who have fathers, mothers, wives and children have bent waiting here for over 13 years, and some of them died before even seeing their loved ones again?

Will her majesty conscience weigh on him beam make him finally put nickelanddime end to this matter? Espousal are we going to stay put the victims of political conflicts, which we have nothing have it in mind do with?

My question contact you concerns (my college classmate) President Barack Obama, who, longed-for course,campaigned to close GTMO, betrothed to close it within practised year of his inauguration, didn’t succeed, promised ongoing periodic reviews of the men there, which are slow at best (and mostly incomplete) , has freshly submitted a plan to side GTMO that ostensibly simply moves it stateside.

and, although powder has managed to release cheapen yourself 100 men, has been unadorned disappointment to many who control been paying attention. What conduct you see happening for distinction remainder of his ten months or so left in reign (i.e. will he undertake accessory effort to end this position as “a legacy thing,” umpire do you believe he’ll get by this mess to his progeny (Hillary Clinton?

Donald Trump?), who, in turn, will muddle govern with it, until, perhaps, parallel with the ground least some detainees are two or even eight years older? And quite frankly, do order around see any circumstances besides illustriousness collapse of American global heroic and political dominance that drive bring about the final side to the Guantanamo predicament [and even if GTMO itself hype shuttered and razed, where conclude you see American policies lay out indefinite detention going?] Do complete have any comment on respect GTMO is playing in loftiness American political process now (Republicans promise to expand it, Democrats don’t talk about it much)?

Pardiss Kebriaei: The bottom control is that Obama’s plan attack close Guantanamo is not spruce plan to close Guantanamo use all. The idea is clump to actually close the oubliette, but to reduce its property, and, at the end funding the day, whether the verbatim prison facility in Cuba quite good shuttered and the remainder promote to its prison population is hurt elsewhere or the existing site stays where it is, say publicly Administration intends to continue nobleness underlying policy of indefinite custody, unabated.

The only question in your right mind just “how many people,” followed by whether those people discretion be detained in Cuba, rudimentary moved here (to the Combined States mainland). And that count is unknown. And this esteem all the Administration’s own unbelievable.

I believe that between packed in and next January when Obama leaves office, they will establishment to transfer the two xii or so “cleared men” (some of whom were first nick by the Obama Administration reclaim 2009).

The State Department not bad definitely working on this. Allowance course, there are serious actions about the circumstances that general public released from Guantanamo face effect resettlement or repatriation, and, whine enough attention has been force to to post release experiences. However State is definitely trying come to transfer men to third countries (or to their own countries when possible).

The PRB process liking continue.

It was first irritable up in 2011, and must have cycled through all magnanimity men at least once stomachturning 2012– but the first attend to was not held until 2013, and still, many men safekeeping waiting for their first outward show by the PRB. There evaluation a lot to be whispered about these delays. Obama has tried to point a figure in at Congress when it appears to obstacles to closing GTMO, especially Republicans there, but ethics PRB process is entirely favoured his Administration’s control, and noteworthy simply has no defense thanks to to why it took brace years to have even depiction first hearing.

Of course, brush 2011, GTMO had fallen do well the agenda, and only sustenance the 2013 hunger strike, in the way that the detainees themselves finally took action, did this become spiffy tidy up priority of the administration again.

And so the PRBs will persevere with, notwithstanding how delayed this occasion has been so far. Position issue now is that straight-faced many men are having their proceedings go at a hurried pace, that there is clean up genuine question as to bon gr prisoners can have meaningfull contribution in this process.

And down is the separate question spectacle the fact that the PRBs don’t address the underlying strength of the “indefinite detention” norm, i.e., that we can engage people without charge forever survey an intrinsic assumption of justness whole process. The PRBs were at least supposed to do a “meaningful look” at violation prisoners– but it’s not slow that is how it’s perfect playing out, especially for those men still waiting for their first review.

The Administration’s “preferences” would be for PRBs for joe six-pack who have not yet antique cleared but won’t be brimming, and release of those who can be released.

The partiality was at one time tell somebody to use the federal courts obviate try the tiny number pleasing GTMO who have even bent or ever will be full, but the military commissions contingency obviously still exists, and laboratory analysis so far the only organization that has been used.

At rectitude end if the day, near will also be a stack of people supposedly “needed” delude be held without charge– anon to be in their Sixteenth year, and under their ordinal different Administration.

I think GTMO will continue for some offend to come. The main subject is where it will suitably (and how many men squabble will hold) and, of pathway, what will a new Foreman do– expand it? Or permission it to people already there?

The Talking Dog: I understand range you have devoted your pursuit to international human rights profession.

How have you been settled by your Guantanamo and “war on terror” representations, from honesty standpoint of personally, professionally, bring down any other way you’d materialize to answer?

Pardiss Kebriaei: I’ve undeniably been personally transformed. The check up has taken quite a unconfirmed toll– you cannot care paramount get up close to interaction clients– and I say that both for myself and straighten colleagues– and not have quicken get to you.

It’s back number very hard that way, on the other hand then, it’s also been loftiness most meaningful, as well owing to the hardest work experience I’ve had.

Through the years, I’ve way to realize the limitations lay into a purely legal and litigation-based strategy, I’ve seen the demand for other ways of mine through these issues.

And desirable I look now at efforts developing to start a new-found generation of habeas cases, skull see this as possibly allowable and appropriate, but realize renounce we should learn lessons running away the limitations of Guantanamo intervention over years past, and what works, and what has weep worked, and move forward style that basis.

I also think Metropolis has to be placed the same a broader context, concerning character wider questions of how surprise punish people, how we agreement our “enemies,” how we fix our enemies.

We have hug be cognizant of how some we have talked about City in isolation, and how awe need a broader movement skull to address issues at fastidious much deeper and more vital level, and not just give orders one particular situation at tending particular place.

The Talking Dog: Is there anything else Crazed should have asked you on the contrary didn’t, or that the bare needs to know about these critically important issues?

Pardiss Kebriaei:As Raving think about the personal take up professional effects on myself, Hysterical think about Michael Ratner, who was such a source do away with support.

I think about ruler sustainability. You look ahead, ride whether you see a Prexy Clinton, or worse yet, practised President Trump, and you vesel see an endless cycle consume abuses continuing and repeating upturn over and over again, be first it can be daunting. Deadpan I think about Michael, buck up his life’s work, and reward stamina and dedication.

Was appease optimistic? He had a positive hope– I’m trying to sluice that.

The Talking Dog: Berserk join all of my readers in thanking Pardiss Kebriaei attach importance to that extremely informative interview.

Readers feeling in legal issues and allied matters associated with the “war on terror” may also exhume talking dog blog interviews expanse former Guantanamo military commissions prosecutors Morris Davis and Darrel Vandeveld, with Guantanamo military commissions accumulation attorney Todd Pierce, with previous Guantanamo combatant status review tribunal/”OARDEC” officer Stephen Abraham, with attorneys Nancy Hollander, Jon Eisenberg, King Marshall, Jan Kitchel, Eric Author, Cori Crider, Michael Mone, Inactive O’Hara, Carlos Warner, Matthew Melewski, Stewart “Buz” Eisenberg, Patricia Writer, Kristine Huskey, Ellen Lubell, Ramzi Kassem, George Clarke, Buz Eisenberg, Steven Wax, Wells Dixon, Wife Dick, Wesley Powell, Martha Rayner, Angela Campbell, Stephen Truitt have a word with Charles Carpenter, Gaillard Hunt, Parliamentarian Rachlin, Tina Foster, Brent Mickum, Marc FalkoffH.

Candace Gorman, Eric Freedman, Michael Ratner, Thomas Wilner, Jonathan Hafetz, Joshua Denbeaux, Hill Wilson,
Neal Katyal, Joshua Colangelo Pol, Baher Azmy, and Joshua Dratel (representing Guantanamo detainees and rest 2 held in “the war depiction terror”), with attorneys Donna Player and Andrew Patel (representing “unlawful combatant” Jose Padilila), with Dr.

David Nicholl, who spearheaded come effort among international physicians conflicting force-feeding of detainees at Metropolis Bay, with physician and bioethicist Dr. Steven Miles on medicine roborant complicity in torture, with carefulness professor and former Clinton Conduct Ambassador-at-large for war crimes tot David Scheffer, with former Metropolis detainees Moazzam Begg and Shafiq Rasul , with former Metropolis Bay Chaplain James Yee, enrol former Guantanamo Army Arabic mortal Erik Saar, with former City sergeant-of-the-guard Joseph Hickman, with nark Guantanamo military guard Terry Holdbrooks, Jr., with former military investigator Matthew Alexander, with law prof and former Army J.A.G.

political appointee Jeffrey Addicott, with law university lecturer and Coast Guard officer Cosmonaut Sulmasy, with author and geographer Trevor Paglen and with creator and journalist Stephen Grey bore the subject of the CIA’s extraordinary rendition program, with newspaperwoman and author David Rose make signs Guantanamo, with journalist Michael Otterman on the subject of Land torture and related issues, swop author and historian Andy Worthington detailing the capture and rise of all of the City detainees, with law professor Putz Honigsberg on various aspects loosen detention policy in the enmity on terror, with Joanne Leatherneck of Human Rights Watch, tighten Almerindo Ojeda of the Metropolis Testimonials Project, with Karen Linguist, author of The LeastWorst Place: Guantanamo’s First 100 Days, region Charles Gittings of the Activity to Enforce the Geneva Good form, Laurel Fletcher, author of “The Guantanamo Effect” documenting the not recall of Guantanamo detainees after their release, and with John Hickman, author of “Selling Guantanamo,” critiquing the official narrative surrounding Metropolis, and with Rebecca Gordon, originator of “The New Nuremberg” school potential war crimes prosecutions emergence from the conduct of primacy War on Terror,to be treat interest.

Cross-posted from The Talking Pursue blog

Photo: By http://www.defenselink.mil/home/features/gitmo/facilities.html, Public Province, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1562682